The European Union (EU) has made significant strides in enforcing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards through various legislative initiatives, particularly the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which will come into effect in 2024. These regulations are designed to enhance the transparency and accountability of companies in their environmental and social impacts, as well as their governance structures. For businesses operating within the EU, these standards represent a significant shift in how they manage and report on sustainability practices. However, complying with the new EU ESG legislation presents several complex challenges, from data collection and reporting to managing supply chains and stakeholder expectations.
Increased Reporting Requirements and Data Collection
One of the biggest challenges companies face in meeting the new EU ESG standards is the scale and complexity of the reporting requirements. Under the CSRD, more companies are obligated to report on a wide range of sustainability factors, including carbon emissions, social policies, human rights, and governance frameworks. This expanded scope applies to large corporations as well as smaller and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that meet certain thresholds, greatly increasing the number of companies that must comply.
The requirement to provide detailed reports on ESG metrics demands a sophisticated level of data collection and analysis. Many businesses are not equipped with the infrastructure or expertise to collect, measure, and analyse the vast amounts of data required for comprehensive ESG reporting. For example, companies must track Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, which include direct emissions from their own operations, indirect emissions from the energy they use, and emissions from their supply chains and products. Gathering accurate data across these different scopes is particularly challenging for industries with complex, global supply chains, such as manufacturing, construction, and retail.
Furthermore, the EU’s ESG legislation requires standardised reporting according to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which outline the specific metrics and data points that companies must disclose. This uniformity aims to make ESG reports more comparable and transparent across industries, but it also adds an additional layer of complexity for businesses that must align their internal reporting processes with the ESRS guidelines.
Supply Chain Transparency and Accountability
For many companies, particularly those in sectors like fashion, retail, automotive, and manufacturing, the supply chain is a key area where compliance with the EU ESG legislation poses significant challenges. The new regulations place a strong emphasis on supply chain transparency, requiring companies to disclose information about the environmental and social impact of their suppliers and partners.
Ensuring compliance across a global supply chain is difficult, especially when suppliers are located in regions with varying levels of regulatory oversight and enforcement. For example, many companies source raw materials or components from developing countries where environmental standards may be lax, and labour practices may not meet EU human rights standards. Under the new legislation, companies are required to ensure that their suppliers adhere to these higher standards, which means conducting audits, collecting data, and monitoring practices across multiple tiers of their supply chains.
This requirement poses logistical and financial challenges, particularly for smaller companies that may not have the resources to implement comprehensive supply chain monitoring systems. Additionally, the need for real-time supply chain insights means that companies must invest in new technologies and tools to track and report on their suppliers’ practices. Failure to meet these supply chain transparency requirements can result in legal consequences and reputational damage, as consumers and investors are increasingly concerned with the ethical sourcing of products.
Managing Environmental Risks
A central pillar of the EU’s ESG legislation is environmental sustainability, with a strong focus on reducing carbon emissions, resource consumption, and waste. For many companies, especially those in carbon-intensive industries like energy, manufacturing, and transportation, meeting the stringent environmental criteria set by the new regulations presents a substantial challenge.
One of the most immediate difficulties is the requirement to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with the EU’s target of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. Companies are expected to develop and implement strategies to lower their carbon footprints, which often requires costly investments in new technologies, energy-efficient processes, and renewable energy sources. For example, automotive manufacturers are under pressure to transition from fossil fuel-powered vehicles to electric alternatives, while energy companies must shift from traditional energy sources to cleaner alternatives like wind or solar power.
In addition to emissions reduction, businesses must also manage other environmental impacts, such as water usage, waste management, and biodiversity preservation. The new regulations require companies to report on how they are minimising their resource consumption and managing waste, which can involve significant operational changes. For instance, manufacturers may need to adopt circular economy practices, such as designing products for reuse or recycling, which can involve rethinking their entire production process.
The cost of transitioning to more sustainable operations, combined with the complexities of accurately measuring environmental impact, makes this a major challenge for businesses across sectors. Moreover, companies face increased pressure from stakeholders, including investors and consumers, to demonstrate meaningful progress on their environmental commitments, further intensifying the demand for compliance with EU standards.
Social and Human Rights Considerations
The social aspect of ESG is another area where companies are facing new challenges under the 2024 EU regulations. Businesses must now provide detailed disclosures on their labour practices, community engagement, and human rights policies, both within their own operations and throughout their supply chains. This is particularly relevant for industries like fashion, retail, agriculture, and technology, where there have been well-documented issues related to worker exploitation, unsafe working conditions, and forced labour.
Ensuring compliance with the EU’s human rights and labour standards means that companies need to take a proactive approach to managing the social impact of their operations. For example, they must conduct human rights due diligence throughout their supply chains to identify and mitigate risks related to forced labour, child labour, or unsafe working conditions. This involves conducting on-site inspections, working with local governments and NGOs, and engaging in stakeholder consultations to ensure that workers’ rights are being respected at every stage of production.
Additionally, companies are required to report on how they are promoting diversity and inclusion within their workforce, as well as their efforts to engage with and support the communities where they operate. This social responsibility extends to ensuring that their business practices do not harm vulnerable populations, such as Indigenous communities, and that they are contributing to local economic development.
Implementing and monitoring these social practices is not only a compliance issue but also a reputational one, as consumers and investors are increasingly holding companies accountable for their impact on human rights and social equity. Companies that fail to meet these social standards risk facing legal penalties, consumer boycotts, and divestment from ESG-focused investors.
Governance and Ethical Practices
The governance component of ESG focuses on the internal structures and practices that ensure a company’s operations align with ethical and sustainability standards. The new EU legislation places a greater emphasis on governance frameworks, requiring companies to report on their board composition, executive compensation, anti-corruption measures, and risk management processes.
For many companies, especially those in industries with complex ownership structures or international operations, aligning their governance practices with the EU’s ESG requirements is a considerable challenge. The regulations call for increased board oversight of ESG issues, meaning that companies must ensure that sustainability is integrated into their overall business strategy and decision-making processes. This can involve establishing new governance committees or appointing board members with expertise in ESG matters, as well as ensuring that executive compensation is tied to sustainability performance.
In addition to governance structures, companies must also demonstrate transparency and accountability in their reporting and decision-making processes. This includes providing clear, accurate information on how they are managing ESG risks, as well as ensuring that they are complying with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. For multinational companies, this can be particularly challenging, as they must navigate different legal and regulatory environments while ensuring that their governance practices meet the stringent standards set by the EU.
Conclusion
The 2024 EU ESG legislation represents a significant shift in how businesses must operate, particularly in terms of sustainability, social responsibility, and governance. While these regulations aim to create a more transparent and accountable corporate environment, they also present numerous challenges for companies across all sectors. From complex data collection and reporting requirements to ensuring supply chain transparency and managing environmental risks, companies must invest in new systems, processes, and technologies to meet the EU’s stringent ESG standards.
At the same time, businesses must also navigate the reputational risks associated with failing to comply with these regulations. Consumers, investors, and regulators are increasingly demanding that companies demonstrate real progress on ESG issues, and those that fail to do so risk losing market share and access to capital. While meeting the challenges of the new EU ESG legislation is no small feat, it also presents an opportunity for companies to differentiate themselves as leaders in sustainability and corporate responsibility, ultimately driving long-term success in a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.
To find out more about how VICTVS Ground Truth Reporting services can help you to meet these challenges, please contact us here.
References:
- European Commission. (2021). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12648-Corporate-sustainability-reporting_en
- European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2022). European Sustainability Reporting Standards. https://www.efrag.org/
- United Nations Global Compact. (2021). ESG and Corporate Governance. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/our-work/governance/esg
